Pisay! PSHS Alumni Forum and Updates - http://pisayforum.blogspot.com/
I’m late with the news. Right.
As the title suggests, all this talk and controversy (regarding giving a “second chance” to three PSHS seniors after getting a 5.0 in Math) has made me want to talk about it, though “briefly”, as well.
First of all, though I find the decision for this “second chance” abhoring (too much AI?), I deem my opinion as of now to be a little bit on the bias side since I’ve yet to hear the statements of the students involved. Take note, students, not the parents or lawyers or any other relatives who will just waste our time (yes, that was another biased comment as well). It gets rather tiring to hear adults speak out when their children make mistakes - as if showing that they are indeed still children. The students have their own lives afterall - and if they wish to actually succeed in this matter, they should use whatever moment in their lives to explain how the freaking hell did they flunk a subject during their graduating year. I’m sure that those seniors should already know how to speak out for themselves and handle the situation - to present to us their excuses defense regarding the matter.
Were they the ones who wanted the second chance? Are they regretting not trying harder for that particular subject? Or are they just going with whatever is convenient?
I respect the policy change, and I respect that at least we’re still willing to make changes now.
But then again, if you know me personally, my definition of “respect” could very well massacre that of the dictionary’s.
Ah yes, bias.
Math 5 was hard for me as well. My quarterly grades were going up and down that it wouldn’t be surprising if I got less than 2.5. I struggled with every exam (failed some, averaged in others) but I survived until the very end. And that’s nothing unique. When I fail in something, I unconsciously improve the second time around - university math, though it was what you can call a “breeze,” was the one that pulled my grades up.
Ahem.
I’m not exactly very familiar with the rules and all that of the high school (hohoho), but I distinctly remember that the quarterly grades were cumulative or something (1/3 of the previous quarter + 2/3 of the current quarter). Or something. So if what I was saying is true, it’s rather difficult to get that 5. Given all the possible sources of grade points (tests, quizzes, attendance), as one alumni pointed out, to be able to achieve a 5 would mean not trying at all.
It’s not pure laziness of course. There are many reasons for “not trying at all”.
And some I consider acceptable, to some degree.
Well, that’s what I think.
Now if I were to really delve into the issue, I can’t believe this turned out to be such a big matter at all (”big,” meaning “very much talked about by the alumni” kind of thing). Not letting failed students to graduate is a simple and logical thing to do - it’s what other good, respectable schools do. I can totally see where the complaints are coming from. Being an alumni myself, it is rather insulting to have done something like this. Tarnishing the school reputation - not only that of producing the best of the best, but also status of a good high school - would definitely be a bigger issue later when things get out.
But then again, I’m not pompous enough to believe that this was a purely bad decision. It is most probably a conscience 2 and conscience 3 kind of problem. Since they decided that those 3 students somehow deserve a second chance to prove themselves and earn the diploma, I suppose it is true to some extent (if they have pure uno’s and only one singko, I would have gladly given them the diploma as well. But I don’t think that’s the case =P).
Yes, it is insulting, unfair and confusing why this happened. But that’s how it is.
Anyway, whatever I say (whether I agree or not) will not change the fact that many people will not stop until this matter is resolved.
I wonder how those three are feeling right now? To have the world go against them and hinder their first chance of a good future. Do they read the posts and other online articles/blogs written about them? Do they feel that even if everyone is talking about school reputation and fairness, that some are also implying that they don’t deserve to be there, that they have made such a big mistake, that they are lazy or stupid or unwise for failing?
It’s sad to see that the time I’m starting to love my high school, so many controversies are coming about.